I am writing this to tell you that I am going to Nana and Papa's soon (Stephen's mom and dad). Nana and Papa live in Cobourg. You can see it here.
They are taking me to Canada's Wonderland and the Cobourg Beach. We're also going to the cottage. We might be going to a couple of museums. Well anyways, this has been a good post. Arthur (and Stephen) out!
Darlene Pennington-Johnson: The Verbal Art of Bribery: Going Further than Detroit’s Front Door
Stephen Teran: Aviation English and Communication Problems
Kaitlin Muklewicz: Physician communication with women who have multiple sclerosis
Georgia Diamantopoulos: The Linguistic Expression of a Greek-American Identity
Kelsey Garason: Exploring Language and Gender through Blood and Combat
Brenna Moloney: The Dialectics of Pronoun Use in Modern Russia
Leah Esslinger: Greeting Patterns in Midtown Detroit
Kimberly Anne Shay: Indigenous Language and Assimilation: Navajo and the Workplace
Sarah Carson: Black Nerds in the Media: A Linguistic Analysis
Julie Haase: Judging a Wine (Or Winery) by its Label
Kimberly A. Compton: A Community of Practice and Constructing Children’s Agency
Katherine Korth: AKC: Ravelry’s Impact on the Language of Knitters
(in case you're still reading ... you are, aren't you?)
This evening, after Arthur and I were working on binary and hexadecimal numerals (yes, yes, I know, nerd alert), he wanted to know if there were any other ways of writing numbers. So of course I told him that I wrote a book on the subject. That was where my trouble began. Then he asked how many books I've written, and I told him: just the one, but I have another one coming out soon. So naturally, he asked me how long it was, and I told him, about 300 pages, to which he replied, "Well, I can see why you aren't done it yet, then!" Hmph. And then he wanted to know my publication plans for the next several books after that. What will the next one be? Well, I wasn't sure, but I thought it might be on my stop signs research (for which he has been my field research 'assistant' in the past), but he remarked skeptically, "Why would anyone care about that and why would it be a good book?" Fair enough, I suppose. I probably should be able to answer that question. He then wanted to know about the next one, and I told him it might be about my Math Corps research. He looked at me and then said seriously, "Your first book was pretty good. It was about a specific subject in math. So you should do that again." Then he suggested that maybe what I need to do is to publish a 'special edition' of my first book, with 15% new material so we can just put a sticker on the cover. I told him that I already put everything I knew about numerical notation in the first edition. He suggested that that was a mistake. So there.
On the plus side, when I showed him his name in the acknowledgements of Numerical Notation, where I wrote, "Arthur Chrisomalis provided useful firsthand insights into the childhood acquisition of lexical and graphic numeration,
and rekindled his father’s wonderment at the magic of numbers," he gave me a big hug and told me he loved me. Awwww. Then, for his bedtime story tonight, he asked me to read to him from Numerical Notation, which of course I did, and he even laughed at the joke on page 2 (where I give as an example of ordination the list, "1. Wash dishes, 2. Sweep floor, 3. Finish manuscript"). However, after reading a long and dense paragraph I turned to him and asked, "Did you understand any of that?", to which he replied, "I wasn't really paying attention to half of it." So, I'll count that as a half-win.
Every year for the past several years I've been tracking the number of jobs listed on the American Anthropological Association job postings as of September 26. That date is somewhat arbitrary and I chose it for historical reasons, but a slightly different date wouldn't really change much when what I'm looking at is the overall trend, year-over-year. As a proxy for the health of the job market in anthropology, though, the AAA listings are ideal, since, at least historically, virtually every tenure-stream position in the discipline gets listed there (but see below). So here we have it, including the 2012 figure:
While this looks like a slight decrease from last year, I actually think that actually there are around the same number of jobs, or possibly even trending slightly up, for three reasons:
First, there are definitely fewer postdocs or nationally-advertised one-year positions listed on the AAA site than in the past. In the past, upwards of 20% of jobs posted were postdocs or visiting positions or jobs outside the academy; this year, fewer than 10% of the posted jobs are non-tenure-track. So that's a good sign just in general (though it makes me wonder where all the postdocs have gone).
Second, I've noticed a lot more institutions posting tenure-track anthropology jobs on more general sites (like the Chronicle of Higher Ed or Inside Higher Ed) rather than the AAA. One possibility is that this may reflect a decline in the AAA's prestige, but I don't think that's too likely. Alternately, I've heard that the their AAA's job listings are quite pricey, so maybe they're just getting priced out of the market in an era when deans are more reluctant in the past to allow big budgets for job searches.
Third, my sense (anecdotal, admittedly) is that while formerly many if not most jobs were posted in September, now lots of tenure-track positions get posted in October or later. This may partly be because deans/provosts don't approve searches as early, although I've heard that jobs in English lit are decidedly up already by this point, which would work against that idea. More significantly, anthropology departments are definitelyl less likely in the past to interview candidates at the November annual meetings (relying on Skype or phone interviews instead), because of the cost of national searches and the ease of video interview. Thus, positions can be advertised later and with a later closing date. This will be confirmed or refuted within a few weeks as we see how many new postings come in October.
( Collapse )
Unfortunately, despite the puzzle being perfect in lots of ways (it's educational, it's complex enough but not ridiculous, it was cheap as hell), it has one small flaw, but one that is particularly galling to me. Those astute in the ways of Canadian geography will spot it:
( Collapse )
Well, you can't have everything. Anyway, Arthur is now ready to take on a bigger challenge.
I was in a pub the other day and saw a barometer on the wall. It was old and has the word pausodonoptic on it. I had never heard of this before and was curious so I did a bit of searching online. I didn't really find any definition of the word anywhere. I was disappointed that I couldn't find it on your site either. Have you any idea what it means? I shall look forward to hearing back from you.
I get plenty of these from my dutiful readers, and most of them are easily handled, but this one is a real puzzle: pausodonoptic is not in any of the usual online dictionaries, nor is it in the OED. The correspondent sent a photo of the object, so the spelling is correct. While there are a couple dozen websites that use the word, applied to various items (spectacles, barometers, cameras), but none that give a real sense of what it is supposed to mean. So, a mystery - but one that I was eventually able to solve (I think). My response:
You're quite right that 'pausodonoptic' is not used in context anywhere on the web, and indeed, nothing like it is found in the mammoth Oxford English Dictionary. This suggests that it is a coinage used by a manufacturer for the purposes of advertising some feature of the device. Now, 'pausodontic' looks as if it must be Greek-derived, so I turned to the Liddell and Scott classical Greek lexicon. There I looked for words starting with 'pauso-' and found pausodunos 'soothing pain'. This could then combine (a little improperly, and changing the final 'u' to 'o'), with -optic to mean something like 'soothing pain of the eyes', or in other words, relieving eye strain or pain. I was still a little confused, because this doesn't seem to be a suitable characteristic for a barometer. However, looking at the range of products called 'pausodonoptic' using a Google search, I note that there is a pausodonoptic camera and pausodonoptic spectacles. One advertisement from 1890 even says "You will act with discretion if you buy the New Pausodonoptic Spectacles or Eye-Glasses, (convex or concave), so comfortable and cooling to the eyes. They will enable you to read or sew, especially at night, with positive pleasure when others fail." The photo you sent afterwards, with the maker indicated as an optician, confirms this idea. My guess, then, is that the glass used in the barometer must be somehow specially treated in the same way, perhaps to reduce glare. Whether any of the buyers could figure out, or cared about, the Greek-derived coinage is unknown, but manufacturers both then and now often give scientific-sounding names to their products to enhance the sense that they must be effective.
So, what do you think of my explanation? Anyone have any alternate suggestions?